IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION,TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT[2013] EWHC 3201 (TCC) Before : MR. JUSTICE EDWARDS-STUART Between: Doosan Babcock Limited as Claimant
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE HAGUE, 11 December 2012, Case no. 200.079.897/01 “VOS SYMPATHY”Judges: M.M. Olthof, A.A. Rijperman and R. van der Vlist Dana
THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, [2012] EWHC 3468 (Comm), December 5, 2012 “GREATSHIP DHRITI” Judge: MRS JUSTICE GLOSTER, DBE Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUITNo 12-30230March 1, 2013 “DEEPWATER HORIZON” Ranger Insurance Limited et al v BP et al The
The paper that can be downloaded by opening this page and clicking here contains a discussion of the judgement of the Amsterdam District Court of 1 June
The Netherlands is a jurisdiction in which it is easy to arrest ships. In the paper that can be downloaded by clicking open this page
Over the years some uncertainty has existed in the Netherlands concerning the construction of Article 3.1. and 3.4. of the Arrest Convention 1952, where it
In its judgement of February 1, 2008 regarding the NDS PROVIDER the Supreme Court of the Netherlands held that the purpose of the duty of
Dr Nick Margetson’s Phd Thesis “The system of liability of articles III and IV of the Hague [Visby] Rules” was reviewed by Professor D. Rhidian
In its two decisions of 12 September 1997 relating to the HANJIN OAKLAND (United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Ltd. versus Hanjin Shipping Co.
